Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorŠipikal, Miroslav
dc.contributor.authorPisár, Peter
dc.contributor.authorUramová, Mária
dc.identifier.citationE+M. Ekonomie a Management = Economics and Management. 2010, č. 4, s. 74-85.cs
dc.identifier.issn1212-3609 (Print)
dc.identifier.issn2336-5604 (Online)
dc.format12 s.
dc.publisherTechnická univerzita v Libercics
dc.relation.ispartofseriesE+M. Ekonomie a Management = Economics and Managementcs
dc.rights© Technická univerzita v Libercics
dc.rightsCC BY-NC 4.0cs
dc.subjectpodpora inovacícs
dc.subjectregionální inovační strategiecs
dc.subjectzemě V4cs
dc.subjectregionální rozvojcs
dc.subjectregionální konkurenceschopnostcs
dc.titleSupport of innovation at regional levelen
dc.description.abstract-translatedThe aim of this article is to evaluate the support of innovation on the regional level and the regional levels in V4 countries. We analyse regional innovation strategies in these countries. The regional development strategies are relatively new phenomenon in V4 countries. Most of the re- gions created their strategies less than five years ago and many of them have been still in imple- mentation phase, so we concentrate more on the creation of innovation strategies rather than on their implementation. The paper has two main parts - theoretical background containing the examples and reasons for innovation support at the regional level as well as key problems for governance of innovation support, mainly the problem of complexity of innovation support, which goes behind officially esta- blished borders. The second part compares activities and measures of 29 regional innovation strategies in these regions and identifies some key differences among them. We found out more similarities among the regions from the same country rather than similarities among the regions with similar level of development (e.g. in metropolitan regions). We deal with some key issues for regional innovation strategies – appropriate level and the role of regional self-governments for creation of strategy, se- ctoral dimension of RIS or “building cathedral in the desert” problem. We also identify dominance of hard infrastructure measures in the strategies. We also compare specific innovation strategies with general regional development strategies in order to identify key differences in governing crea- tion of these strategies. We suggested some improvement in the process of creation and implementation strategies. The concentration of priorities and resources is of crucial importance for success. Better evaluation process is needed to be able to more prioritise the suggested activities and to be more specific on particular regional needs.en
dc.subject.translatedsupport of innovationen
dc.subject.translatedregional innovation strategiesen
dc.subject.translatedV4 countriesen
dc.subject.translatedregional developmenten
dc.subject.translatedregional competitivenessen
Appears in Collections:Číslo 4 (2010)
Číslo 4 (2010)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
06_sipikal.pdfPlný text211,14 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11025/17367

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.