Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBeránková, Petra A.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-02T09:37:42Z
dc.date.available2017-01-02T09:37:42Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationAntropowebzin. 2016, č. 3-4, s. 53-66.cs
dc.identifier.issn1801–8807
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.antropoweb.cz/media/document/webzin-3-4-2016.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11025/22244
dc.description.abstractThe article introduces a conceptualization of power relationship between interviewer and inter- viewee in a qualitative research interview. The pre- sented conceptualization is based on the semiotic triad (syntax, semantics, and pragmatics). For the purpose of analysing interviews, power is defined as an abil- ity to influence and control one of these three dimen- sions of an interview. However, power relationships are not static; rather, they are dynamically negoti- ated within an interaction. Within this context, dif- ferent types of power can be distinguished: (a) power over the rules of interaction (metapower); (b) agenda- setting power; and (c) positioning and othering of par- ticipants (i. e. dominance). The classification of differ- ent types of power can be used for further systematic investigation into possible power strategies. Showing samples of interviews with politicians, the authoress identifies several examples of power strategies (for in- stance, a change of rules, an opening of new top- ics, and “a wise advice”). She points out that these strategies themselves can produce meanings. The au- thoress also argues that reflecting power relationships within interviews can enhance the validity of research. It can also be helpful for better constituting a scenario and a framework of interviews, or for developing a re- searcher’s own performative strategy. This kind of re- flexivity is also beneficial for thinking through ethical questions coupled with qualitative research.en
dc.format14 s.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isocscs
dc.publisherAntropoWebcs
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAntropowebzincs
dc.rightsAntropoWebzin vychází pod licencí Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/cs
dc.subjectkvalitativní výzkumcs
dc.subjectrozhovorcs
dc.subjectmoccs
dc.subjectkonverzační analýzacs
dc.subjectqualitative researchen
dc.subjectinterviewen
dc.subjectpoweren
dc.subjectconversational analysisen
dc.titleMocenské hry mezi výzkumníkem a informantem: Konceptualizace moci v analýze výzkumného rozhovorucs
dc.title.alternativePower shifts between interviewer and interviewee: conceptualizing power strategiesen
dc.typečlánekcs
dc.typearticleen
dc.rights.accessopenAccessen
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen
dc.type.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionen
Appears in Collections:Číslo 3-4 (2016)
Číslo 3-4 (2016)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Berankova.pdfPlný text173,35 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11025/22244

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.