Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSloup, Ondřej
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-04T09:50:46Z
dc.date.available2016-01-04T09:50:46Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationAntropowebzin. 2015, č. 3-4, s. 117-126.cs
dc.identifier.issn1801–8807
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.antropoweb.cz/webzin/index.php/webzin/index
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11025/17057
dc.format10 s.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isocscs
dc.publisherAntropoWebcs
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAntropowebzincs
dc.rightsAntropoWebzin vychází pod licencí Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/cs
dc.subjectPopper, K. R.cs
dc.subjectkritický racionalismuscs
dc.subjectproblém indukcecs
dc.subjectpotvrzenícs
dc.subjectracionální predikcecs
dc.titleKritické zhodnocení Popperova řešení problému indukcecs
dc.title.alternativeA critical evaluation of Popper’s solution to the problem of inductionen
dc.typečlánekcs
dc.typearticleen
dc.rights.accessopenAccessen
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen
dc.description.abstract-translatedIs there any kind of justification for a belief that the future will be largely like the past? In the eighteenth century David Hume formulated the problem of induction in a similar spirit, and his version is now conventional. Even two hun- dred and fifty years after Hume’s death, the ef- fort to justify inductive inferences still preoccupies philosophers. Sir Karl Popper believed that he had successfully solved this fundamental philosophical problem. The present article introduces the prob- lematic situation formulated by David Hume, fol- lowed by Popper’s original solution to the problem. Along with that, relevant criticism from JohnWor- rall and Wes Salmon will be presented. It concen- trates on Popper’s rejection of induction and the related inability to implement any prediction about the future within critical rationalism. The validity or failure of Popper’s solution is discussed towards the end of the article, together with a reconsider- ation of the current state of the debate. The last part of the study is devoted to the author’s pro- posal, which should be able to stand up against anti-Popperian objections while remaining within the boundaries of critical-rationalist methodology.en
dc.subject.translatedPopper, K. R.en
dc.subject.translatedcritical rationalismen
dc.subject.translatedproblem of inductionen
dc.subject.translatedcorroborationen
dc.subject.translatedrational predictionen
dc.type.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionen
Appears in Collections:Číslo 3-4 (2015)
Články / Articles (KFI)
Číslo 3-4 (2015)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Sloup.pdfPlný text134,3 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11025/17057

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.