Full metadata record
DC poleHodnotaJazyk
dc.contributor.authorPostelnicu, Cătălin
dc.contributor.authorDinu, Vasile
dc.contributor.authorDabija, Dan-Cristian
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-26T05:36:24Z
dc.date.available2016-01-26T05:36:24Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationE+M. Ekonomie a Management = Economics and Management. 2015, č. 2, s. 4-14.cs
dc.identifier.issn2336-5604 (Online)
dc.identifier.issn1212-3609 (Print)
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ekonomie-management.cz/download/1433862230_178f/01_ECONOMIC+DEGLOBALIZATION.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11025/17607
dc.format11 s.cs
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherTechnická univerzita v Libercics
dc.relation.ispartofseriesE+M. Ekonomie a Management = Economics and Managementcs
dc.rights© Technická univerzita v Libercics
dc.rightsCC BY-NC 4.0cs
dc.subjectglobalizacecs
dc.subjectdeglobalizacecs
dc.subjectmezinárodní obchodcs
dc.subjectpřímé zahraniční investicecs
dc.titleEconomic deglobalization: from hypothesis to realityen
dc.typečlánekcs
dc.typearticleen
dc.rights.accessopenAccessen
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen
dc.description.abstract-translatedLately, a new term is used in international economic literature, namely “de-globalization” which has already sparked off numerous debates. As expected, some economists were quick to adopt it unhesitatingly, but others have labelled it as “absurd”, “superficial”, “simple”, “anachronistic” and even “counterproductive”. In fact, there are two diverging processes opposed to each other, both worth mentioning. First – globalization – with its multiple meanings and definitions, and the second – deglobalization – which is just beginning to find a place within the confines of concepts used in international economics literature. The issue is not to treat them only as antonyms, but rather to demonstrate the causal relation between them. We consider trying to measure deglobalization as an important step in determining the true meaning of such a phenomenon, or if it is real. Also, would be interesting to find out if deglobalization is really a long lasting trend, or just a short term turn in the evolution of the world economy. Using the “globalization index” and its components as a tool in this direction could be one of the potential solutions in defining the meaning of the new and complex changes which tends to shape the international economic relations and, after all, the international business environment. Although it is admitted not being a perfect tool, it could be a starting point in studying such a vast change. Therefore, the motivation of this article is to contribute to theoretical debates that bear on this new term, given that, as in the case of globalization itself, economists have not yet reached a consensus on the definition.en
dc.subject.translatedglobalizationen
dc.subject.translateddeglobalizationen
dc.subject.translatedinternational tradeen
dc.subject.translatedforeign direct investmenten
dc.identifier.doidx.doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2015-2-001
dc.type.statusPeer-revieweden
Vyskytuje se v kolekcích:Číslo 2 (2015)
Číslo 2 (2015)

Soubory připojené k záznamu:
Soubor Popis VelikostFormát 
01_ECONOMIC DEGLOBALIZATION.pdfPlný text859,39 kBAdobe PDFZobrazit/otevřít
Zobrazit minimální záznam Zobrazit statistiky


Použijte tento identifikátor k citaci nebo jako odkaz na tento záznam: http://hdl.handle.net/11025/17607

Všechny záznamy v DSpace jsou chráněny autorskými právy, všechna práva vyhrazena.

hledání
navigace
  1. DSpace at University of West Bohemia
  2. Publikace ZČU / UWB Publications
  3. Časopisy ZČU / UWB Journals
  4. Ekonomie a management
  5. 2015
  6. Číslo 2 (2015)