Title: Právo a spravodlivosť v spore o chomutovské exekúcie
Other Titles: Law and justice in the suit for executions in Chomutov
Authors: Gajdoš, Adam
Citation: AntropoWebzin. 2010, č. 1, s. 55-67.
Issue Date: 2010
Publisher: AntropoWeb
Document type: článek
URI: http://antropologie.zcu.cz/webzin/index.php/webzin/article/view/131
ISSN: 1801-8807
Keywords: dlužník;nepřizpůsobiví;menšinová politika;kritická diskurzivní analýza;Chomutov
Keywords in different language: debter;unadaptables;minority policy;critical discourse analysis;Chomutov
Abstract: At the beginning of year 2009, the mununicipality of the north-bohemian town of Chomutov announced the introduction of distrainment of social benefits as a method of disciplining its notorious debtors. The framing of the policy was ambivalent from the very start: "the debtors" as a group were on one hand blamed for not paying their rents in municipal flats, at the same time, however, they were portrayed as in fact much more than defaultors – as unadaptable violators of the "decent people’s order". The launching of the policy in February 2009 triggered a heated and widely medialized debate on the legal aspects of the practice, whereby two conflicting discourses of legitimity met in confrontation. This article attempts a critical discoursive analysis of the discourse of "unadaptables" (represented by the mayor of Chomutov, Ivana Řápková) and, in complement, of the discourse of "constitutional rights" (represented by the Ministry of Minorities and Human Righst, Michael Kocáb, and Ombudsman, Otakar Motejl). The analytical focus is on radio and newspaper interviews with these three prominent figures within the timespan of the first three months of the controversy. Employing categorization analysis, analysis of positioning and select lexical and rhetorical aspects, the first part offers a detailed description of Řápková’s majority discourse. In the second part, a complementary analysis of the discourse of her critics follows. Finally, a synthesis of the findings aims for a comparative perspective of the controversy. It attempts to show how different framing strategies (local issue with individual characteristics vs. general social issue with collective dimensions) cause the opposing sides to effectively fail to meet in a constructive dialogue on possible solutions of the problem.
Rights: Autoři, kteří chtějí publikovat v tomto časopise, musí souhlasit s následujícími body: Autoři si ponechávají copyright a umožňují časopisu publikovat příspěvky pod Creative Commons Attribution licencí, která umožňuje ostatním sdílet tuto práci s tím, že přiznají jejího autora a první publikování v tomto časopisu. Autorům je dovoleno a doporučováno, aby po publikování svých příspěvků v tomto časopise zpřístupnili svou práci online (například na svých webových stránkách)
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) but only after the final publication.
Appears in Collections:Číslo 1 (2010)
Číslo 1 (2010)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Gajdos.pdfPlný text129,93 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11025/6791

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.