Název:	Pairwise judgments consistency impact on quality of multi-criteria group decision-making with ahp
Autoři:	Kazibudzki, Pawel Tadeusz Křupka, Jiří
Citace zdrojového dokumentu:	E+M. Ekonomie a Management = Economics and Management. 2019, roč. 22, č. 4, s. 195-212.
Datum vydání:	2019
Nakladatel:	Technická univerzita v Liberci
Typ dokumentu:	článek article
URI:	http://hdl.handle.net/11025/36043
ISSN:	2336-5604 (Online) 1212-3609 (Print)
Klíčová slova:	skupinové rozhodování;proces analytické hierarchie;kvalita priorit;soudržnost soudních rozhodnutí
Klíčová slova v dalším jazyce:	group decision making;analytic hierarchy process;prioritization quality;pairwise judgments consistency
Abstrakt v dalším jazyce:	Presumably complex systems can be better understood when they are broken down into their constituent elements and structured hierarchically. Then, judgments about these elements can be synthesized on the basis of their relative importance at each level of the hierarchy into a set of overall priorities. By breaking down a reality into homogenous clusters and subdividing them into smaller ones, it is possible to integrate large amounts of information into the structure of a problém and form a more comprehensive picture of the whole system. There is a decision support methodology (DSM) which conforms to the above prescription. It is called the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and was devised at the Wharton School of Business by Thomas Saaty (1980). Its contemporary applications can be found, for example in Lidinska and Jablonsky (2018), Abdelmaguid and Elrashidy (2016), Kramulová and Jablonský (2016), and Ponis et al. (2015).
Práva:	CC BY-NC 4.0
Vyskytuje se v kolekcích:	Číslo 4 (2019) Číslo 4 (2019)

Všechny záznamy v DSpace jsou chráněny autorskými právy, všechna práva vyhrazena.